At a recent 2-day workshop on Pyramid of Behaviour Interventions, the conversation turned to the question: “What do you
do with the kids who just refuse to do the work?” We had already discussed the
foundation of working collaboratively in a PLC (Professional Learning
Community), being clear and consistent on priority learning outcomes, having a
pyramid response to intervention (PRTI) and being willing to differentiate for
the needs of different learners. “Ya, but…” asked one participant, “what about
the kid who outright, defiantly refuses to do the work and disrupts others in
the process?”
Great question. My first response to that
question is always “Is it a CAN’T or a WON’T?” As Buffum, Mattos and Weber so
succinctly put it, “Behaviour and academics are inextricably linked”. Is it that
the child CAN’T do it, WON’T do it, or BOTH? It is often difficult to separate
the behaviour problem from the academic problem. As you move higher up the pyramid in terms of
intensity and frequency of defiant behaviour, it is almost impossible to
separate the two. To help answer that
question, I asked all of the participants to think of a very challenging
student they had worked with recently.
On their own, I asked them to describe in as much detail as possible all
of the details surrounding that defiant behaviour. What behaviour did you
observe? Can you recall the setting and
situation just before the defiant behaviour? What task was being asked of the
student? What was the intended learning outcome of the task? What was the
student getting or avoiding by exhibiting the undesirable behaviour? Participants then shared these observations
with a colleague.
Together, we walked through the process of
“ABC Analysis”. This is a very simple version of a Functional Behaviour
Assessment that can be done by almost any educator. It does not replace the
work of a trained Functional Assessment specialist, but it is a very helpful
tool for most teachers and education assistants. By breaking down the observations of the
interaction, most educators are able to begin to identify “triggers” to the behaviour,
as well as “consequences” that result from the behaviour. Consequences, in this
context, are the things the student either gets or avoids. Working as a team,
educators can usually differentiate the CAN’T from the WON’T. They are also
usually able to identify some of the underlying causes to the symptoms
displayed and, in most cases can usually prescribe some form of prevention,
intervention, adaptation or assistance.
No comments:
Post a Comment